Measuring the performance of our SMSF has been something that I have thought about quite a bit over the years, and changed my methodology as my thinking changed. I started off using relative benchmarks, so the return compared to the ASX 200 Franking credit adjusted, total return tax exempt, but I was always troubled by the short term nature of this sort of relative benchmark, so I moved to an absolute benchmark - aimng for more than 10% CAGR over the life of the SMSF.
When I thought about it I still wasn't comfortable with this, all these benchmarks rely on calculating a potential capital value of the portfolio at a given point in time, the big problem with that is that we don't realise the capital returns at that point, so the return calculated is meaningless.
I have decided to take a much more realistic benchmark, actual realised returns on invested capital - same way as you would calculate return on cash invested in the bank. So I took the initial capital we invested, added all the dividend returns for the past 6 years, added all the personal contributions we made, and then took the total dividends earned this year on the invested capital and expressed it as a yield - we returned 5.7% for the FY2021 (all dividends have been paid by today, 10/6.) The range has been 3.8% and 6.4% over the 6 years.
In hindsight I think an actual, realised return of over 5% is very satisfactory, more importantly I think that considering the returns in this way and ignoring the much higher potential capital gains means that in the event of a substantial drawdown in the market, I would be emotionally very comfortable and it would be very likely that the real returns measured in this way would suffer very little if any negative impact.